I also understand that apps will take up space, but isnt that what disk. Like the games themselves run fine and whatever but man loading screens on both games and ld… I tried ld player and it seems to work quite well also.
Curvy Women, White Women, Tight Dresses, Sexy Posen, Myah, Belle, Moda
I've made a comparison between 5 different android emulators to see which one is better performance wise. And it is much larger program, needs more disk space compared to ld player. I use nox 64 bit for ak and as and it works quite well.
It used to have audio crackling issues but that's gone now.
Ld player 9 is very comfortable in this regard in terms of performance, but. It also forces downloading all the other players for no reason. When i open emulator, i can't enter anywhere else. Is it safe to login into google accounts/other media in any emulator?i was trying out ld player but i'm not sure if it would safe to use logins data on it (because i've heard.
As the title suggests, ldplayer is running awfully slow. Mumu x was nice but still had some instability. Ive been through nox, bluestack4 and 5, ld players, and mumu 9, x, 12 mumu 9 was awful. But 12, oh my god.
Because emulators really push my laptop very hard.
In the past i found ldplayer so much faster than bluestacks despite the hardware acceleration (gpu) claimed by bluestacks. The ld player emulates touch with the mouse, but the android support usb mouses, is there any way for me to use the mouse as an usb device instead of the touch emulation? I am not talking about ram, ldplayer's ram usage on my pc is actually quite okay on my pc. It just completely changed my.
